They often in turn use what they have gained to develop further insights, services, products, and policies that deliver broader public benefits.
Looking at patterns in this analysis, the following statistically significant associations were identified:
Reports or other types of static information tended to be used most with government stakeholders, and significantly less with industry and business.
Analytic software or methods as well as shared vietnam rcs data technology or software were used more to develop impacts with industry and business, and significantly less with specific publics.
Professionals as opposed to government stakeholders tended to benefit most from improved institutional processes.
other impact instruments, e.g. gaining benefits via policy change.
Various connections were found between predictor variables and certain outcomes such as identified types of impact and beneficiaries, for example:
The field of research, that is, which type of academic discipline the research data-linked impacts were attributed to, was found to be a moderate predictor of impacts. For instance, practice impacts were significantly more commonly associated with the field of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences than with other research fields.