He notes that there can be other pitfalls to cloud migration, such as organizations becoming locked into a specific provider due to their choice of technology. To avoid this, he says, organizations can choose open source technology, which allows them to create a vendor-agnostic platform that can be supported by multiple providers. “But it’s expensive. It takes twice as long, so it costs twice as much, so is it worth it?” asks Valentine.
the inevitable loss of its cloud services, he said the only option was to take all the code and implement any currently overdue changes. "There's no other way," he said.
Despite the possibility of losing access to cloud resources due to a disaster or the termination of a service contract, Valentine doubts that organizations will suddenly revert to their old on-premises ways as a long-term alternative to working in the cloud. “There’s no reason to migrate the cloud on-premises permanently,” he says. “I can’t see pakistan mobile database reversing course. Careers have been built on this digital transformation.”
According to Valentine, digital transformation is still in its early stages as an industry trend: “We’re probably only 10% of the way there,” he says. However, it’s already predicted that 20% of all apps will remain on-premise forever.
Potential changes that could make the cloud landscape more flexible could come from Google’s Anthos hybrid cloud platform, he says. AWS is also discussing “run-anywhere” technologies in its cloud, at the edge, or in another provider’s cloud. “Ultimately, cloud application providers themselves are recognizing that cloud applications need to be more portable than they have been in the past,” Valentine says.
Providers other than AWS, Google Cloud Platform, and Microsoft Azure are also coming to terms with the need for layers above the infrastructure. “Snowflake is the best example,” says Valentine, referring to the well-known cloud data platform. “Instead of coding your own IaaS lake with AWS, Azure, or GCP, you can buy a platform from Snowflake.”