A bolder attempt
An article I wrote last year titled "T+0 trading may be a good way to save A-shares" suggested that the T+0 trading system be liberalized or piloted.
Many people find reasons to say that the "T+0" trading system is not in line with national conditions and may cause the market to go to extremes. Retail investors will be less able to compete with institutions and will be more likely to be harvested. But perhaps even they are not sure whether such a reason is tenable.
Under the “T+1” system, are stock investors really well ivory coast telegram data protected?
Isn’t it obvious what the current outcome of the A-share market will be?
This kind of protection prevents stock investors from having the right to buy and sell at any time on the same day, resulting in them having to accept the loss once they are trapped in the stock. This actually to some extent encourages retail investors to chase themes and concepts in order to increase the certainty of profit from buying, and to engage in short-term speculation by selling at a loss after being trapped in the stock on the same day due to "panic of losing more."
In order to avoid being trapped by bottom-fishing on the same day, many investors only choose themes that they believe are most likely to rise, and are even willing to enter the market at the upper limit. However, they often fall into the trap of themes deliberately fabricated by institutions in advance, and become the leeks that are harvested after entering the market. In particular, some stocks suddenly plunged rapidly during trading, and investors who bought them on that day didn't even have a chance to escape.