However, the transitions between the two approaches are usually fluid, and both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages. More on this in the next section of this text.
Don't be confused by the debate about america rcs data low-code vs. no-code. Both approaches have the same goal: to speed up and simplify software development.
If you need to decide which approach to take, the following distinguishing features may help you.
No-code aims to be accessible to everyone. aimed at developers and people with basic knowledge of a programming language.
No-code primarily works with drag-and-drop and web forms to help the user create the design and program logic. Low-code can also use hand-written code or custom functions.
No-code specifies large parts of the design to simplify operation. On the one hand, this is restrictive, but it allows for quick familiarization. Low-code offers greater flexibility in designing the user interface. In some cases, you can add new elements or edit elements using your own code.
Often, a clear assignment is not possible, as the various solutions offer tools from both the low-code and no-code areas. In the following, I will therefore only speak of no-code in this text, knowing full well that in some places low-code would also be a better fit.