Another day passed
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2025 5:15 am
— The main question, in fact, is not this. Why did the banker's car turn onto Tsvetnaya? After all, if it had continued driving straight and turned onto St. Mark's Street, it would have been much easier for them to escape pursuit.
— There was no pursuit. But, according to Google Maps, there was a traffic jam on St. Mark's.
- Great. But I was driving along this street at the time and there were no traffic jams!!!
— And Google claims that there were. And the maximum ones.
- Karl, make a request to Google, let them give you a map with traffic jams from 12:30 to 1:30 p.m. The banker was killed at 1:00 p.m.?
- Yes.
— Can we request data from video cameras on this street and in general on nearby ones?
- Already.
- Well done. And what's there?
— The streets are empty. But! On St. Mark's Street and two adjacent ones, identical-looking homeless people are pulling strange carts with junk.
— Can you see the faces of these homeless people?
- Only one. And when you zoom in, it looks like he's much younger than he'd like to appear. I've already given the order to remove the makeup from his face and put him on the wanted list.
- Well done!
— I think I figured out what it was. Google responded. According to their data, at that moment at least a hundred smartphones were moving slowly along St. Mark's Street and two neighboring streets. So the program decided that there were traffic jams there.
- And in reality?
— But in fact, I think these brazil mobile database were in the cars of those homeless people and simulated a traffic jam. As a result, the banker's car turned right into an ambush.
- Well done. We encountered a competent use of technology. We need to take this into service.
A week later, they caught one of the people playing the role of the homeless. And a month later, they managed to figure out the organizer of the murder. But this is already the police routine.
Do you think these are fairy tales? No! Of course, technology should be trusted. But always? I don't know!
— There was no pursuit. But, according to Google Maps, there was a traffic jam on St. Mark's.
- Great. But I was driving along this street at the time and there were no traffic jams!!!
— And Google claims that there were. And the maximum ones.
- Karl, make a request to Google, let them give you a map with traffic jams from 12:30 to 1:30 p.m. The banker was killed at 1:00 p.m.?
- Yes.
— Can we request data from video cameras on this street and in general on nearby ones?
- Already.
- Well done. And what's there?
— The streets are empty. But! On St. Mark's Street and two adjacent ones, identical-looking homeless people are pulling strange carts with junk.
— Can you see the faces of these homeless people?
- Only one. And when you zoom in, it looks like he's much younger than he'd like to appear. I've already given the order to remove the makeup from his face and put him on the wanted list.
- Well done!
— I think I figured out what it was. Google responded. According to their data, at that moment at least a hundred smartphones were moving slowly along St. Mark's Street and two neighboring streets. So the program decided that there were traffic jams there.
- And in reality?
— But in fact, I think these brazil mobile database were in the cars of those homeless people and simulated a traffic jam. As a result, the banker's car turned right into an ambush.
- Well done. We encountered a competent use of technology. We need to take this into service.
A week later, they caught one of the people playing the role of the homeless. And a month later, they managed to figure out the organizer of the murder. But this is already the police routine.
Do you think these are fairy tales? No! Of course, technology should be trusted. But always? I don't know!