Explain your answers in detail
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:12 am
Developers may feel this way if they see security telling two teams different things. From a security perspective, these different answers are perfectly appropriate and accurate. But for developers, it's a question of trust.
They lose faith when advice is inconsistent, and a developer who has lost trust in the security team will stop paying attention to security.
Tip: and offer to get a second opinion. To do this:
When interacting with developers, never assume that you are understood; points of view may differ too much. Check the level of understanding until you are sure that it is sufficient. Ask the developers if they agree with your conclusions, and discuss in more detail if they disagree;
make sure your team is giving the same directions;
Provide developers with the opportunity to get a second opinion.
6. "I can't please everyone."
Developers are under pressure every day to fix bugs and implement features. If their manager doesn't see fit to spend resources on meeting corporate security requirements, they are torn apart. To meet security requirements, they must go against their manager's direct orders.
Tip: Raise awareness of the need for resources dedicated to security. To do this:
Get approval for the allocation of resources allocated to algeria whatsapp data at all levels: managers, directors and executives;
Provide estimates of how long it takes on average to complete security activities;
Launch a campaign to make everyone aware of the need to communicate about the resources required to ensure security.
7. "The security service is an isolated unit that acts as a supervisor."
DevOps encourages open communication between all team members; isolated security operations are alien to developers because they block workflows and make communication difficult, requiring more meetings to synchronize. In addition, security wants to make all the decisions. Overseers are annoying because their desire to control the process slows things down.
Advice: partnership, not supervision. To do this:
Just let it go. Build an automated process and rely on it to succeed;
They lose faith when advice is inconsistent, and a developer who has lost trust in the security team will stop paying attention to security.
Tip: and offer to get a second opinion. To do this:
When interacting with developers, never assume that you are understood; points of view may differ too much. Check the level of understanding until you are sure that it is sufficient. Ask the developers if they agree with your conclusions, and discuss in more detail if they disagree;
make sure your team is giving the same directions;
Provide developers with the opportunity to get a second opinion.
6. "I can't please everyone."
Developers are under pressure every day to fix bugs and implement features. If their manager doesn't see fit to spend resources on meeting corporate security requirements, they are torn apart. To meet security requirements, they must go against their manager's direct orders.
Tip: Raise awareness of the need for resources dedicated to security. To do this:
Get approval for the allocation of resources allocated to algeria whatsapp data at all levels: managers, directors and executives;
Provide estimates of how long it takes on average to complete security activities;
Launch a campaign to make everyone aware of the need to communicate about the resources required to ensure security.
7. "The security service is an isolated unit that acts as a supervisor."
DevOps encourages open communication between all team members; isolated security operations are alien to developers because they block workflows and make communication difficult, requiring more meetings to synchronize. In addition, security wants to make all the decisions. Overseers are annoying because their desire to control the process slows things down.
Advice: partnership, not supervision. To do this:
Just let it go. Build an automated process and rely on it to succeed;