Video and other fabrication of proof

[Shishirgano9]

If debating the post-truth era eminently poses the place of journalism as guarantor, what function can it exercise when the very notion of fact is redrawn in what we call synthetic reality? Synthetic reality Synthetic reality appears when the informational overlay doubles the real world, when the digital twin and the real become equivalent for the individual due to a process of convergence of the physical and the digital, real processes and the virtues of virtual communities. With daily practice and the creation of taste for these synthetic media, from Instagram to video games, the very perception of a synthetic reality is naturalized, as evidenced by the purchases of virtual goods.


Synthetic reality modifies the truth regime and therefore paytm database the essence of journalism: how to translate facts that are not real in the classical sense. If we look at current trends in the fabrication of truth in conspiracy communities in particular, the very fact of relaying is a process of creating a reality by saturating social networks with an image, a. Deployed in the metaverse, the dominant regime of truth is that of the diffusion of mass circulation, in the most virulent forms, the fabrication of proof no longer meeting the criterion of truth but of artificial repetition.


Furthermore, how can we accept that facts in synthetic universes are commonly considered real, if not that they are shared. The validation of things by intersubjectivity is decisive here: how can we account for facts that only exist in the interpersonal exchange of non-physical goods whose value is a speculation on the future value granted by a not yet constituted exchange community? Even for economic journalism that follows the stock market, it faces many constraints, the first being the marketplace. Metaverses result in strong support from the community gathering in online spaces.