make efforts to expand the list of signatories to the Charter

[relemedf5w023]

It is easy to see that among the above points there are some that hardly anyone will argue with. At the same time, some participants in the information security market note that there are also points that indicate support for strengthening market regulation by FSTEC. However, the question of how this affects the market is highly debatable. There is also the following opinion: "It is the result that needs to be controlled, not the formal compliance with the requirements." There is also an opinion that it is simply inappropriate for many companies offering information security products to certify their solutions - it does not pay off. Supporters of this opinion say: "For certification of a specific product to pay off, its sales volume must be several million dollars."

However, in any document you can find both pros and cons. Moreover, what is a pro for some is a cons for others. Everything depends not only on the quality of the document, but also on the views of critics.

"The purpose of this document is to form an industry community of south korea whatsapp data companies ready to work in this market in a civilized manner and participate in its development. In the future, based on the companies that signed the Charter, it is planned to work out mechanisms of industry self-regulation. The development of such mechanisms will take place within the circle of signatories," said Nikolay Komlev, Executive Director of APKIT.

The first signatories of the Charter were the heads of 12 companies: Business Computers Group LLC, InfoTeKS OJSC, Gamma Scientific and Production Enterprise Federal State Unitary Enterprise, Code of Security LLC, National Computer Corporation (NCC), Elvis-Plus JSC, Jet Infosystems, Academy of Information Systems, TONK Group of Companies LLC, Information Security Center LLC (ISC), EleSi JSC and Aladdin RD. The Charter is open to new signatories.