It is necessary to demonstrate that there was in fact an unexplained
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 4:16 am
This is a crucial aspect: the constitutional function of the adjudicating body must be dear to it and, therefore, the judge or chamber must not renounce its rightful place, its importance and relevance. One could say that this is an overload of judicial functions at a time when the courts, at all levels, are subject to an intense schedule. This does not seem to be the case: if the rule were to give both parties, through experts and technical assistants, access to income tax returns and bank and credit card statements, this entire phase of equalizing individual relationships to define what is effectively the common assets would be the work of such experts, with the judge being exclusively responsible for deciding on the points that prove to be controversial.
This would be a great development: a judicial management focused bulk sms packages in ghana on efficiency to compensate for the high volume of lawsuits. In fact, returning to the dialogue between Family Law and Business Law, it will be useful to remember that this is the logic of Law 11.101/05: in bankruptcy and corporate recovery , it is up to the judge to decide on legal issues; it is the judicial administrator who deals with the broad range of bureaucratic issues.
We need to evolve to consider auditing and assessment procedures with a broad scope to determine what constitutes the common assets and, therefore, the value of each half as absolutely regular in divorce (marriage) and dissolution (stable union) proceedings. And this must be done with broad access, by trusted assistants of the court and the parties, who allow such work.
This would be a great development: a judicial management focused bulk sms packages in ghana on efficiency to compensate for the high volume of lawsuits. In fact, returning to the dialogue between Family Law and Business Law, it will be useful to remember that this is the logic of Law 11.101/05: in bankruptcy and corporate recovery , it is up to the judge to decide on legal issues; it is the judicial administrator who deals with the broad range of bureaucratic issues.
We need to evolve to consider auditing and assessment procedures with a broad scope to determine what constitutes the common assets and, therefore, the value of each half as absolutely regular in divorce (marriage) and dissolution (stable union) proceedings. And this must be done with broad access, by trusted assistants of the court and the parties, who allow such work.