The second example is to make it clear that even
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:12 am
This is a separate work, with its own specifics and techniques. It is also important to understand that the decision on which of the proposed options for optimizing work will be implemented in practice is made by the business manager, and the final result depends on this no less than on the quality of the business analyst's work. Examples Next, I will show examples of how incorrect initial data leads to incorrect conclusions. And why such attempts to get rid of a person often end sadly. I gave the first example to demonstrate how it works.
The scale of the company may not save you from morocco whatsapp number data problems. Example 1. Automation of an online store A very common situation is optimizing the work of an online store. Initially, several people worked on processing orders: Operators who manually transferred orders received from the website into the accounting system. A warehouse worker who was directly involved in shipping orders. After optimization, the need for operators disappeared, since the order is automatically transferred to the accounting system, where all the necessary documents are created and the goods are reserved without human participation.
As a result, the person who is engaged in the shipment of orders can independently print out documents and prepare a list of goods for shipment without the help of operators. Operators are not needed at all. "On paper" it all looks perfect. The system is implemented, the operators are fired. The warehouse worker gets a list of duties (printing documents), and if they are very lucky, their salary is increased. The company saves money by cutting several positions, and human errors are eliminated. Everything should work better than before. In practice, it turns out that the situation is far from rosy.
The scale of the company may not save you from morocco whatsapp number data problems. Example 1. Automation of an online store A very common situation is optimizing the work of an online store. Initially, several people worked on processing orders: Operators who manually transferred orders received from the website into the accounting system. A warehouse worker who was directly involved in shipping orders. After optimization, the need for operators disappeared, since the order is automatically transferred to the accounting system, where all the necessary documents are created and the goods are reserved without human participation.
As a result, the person who is engaged in the shipment of orders can independently print out documents and prepare a list of goods for shipment without the help of operators. Operators are not needed at all. "On paper" it all looks perfect. The system is implemented, the operators are fired. The warehouse worker gets a list of duties (printing documents), and if they are very lucky, their salary is increased. The company saves money by cutting several positions, and human errors are eliminated. Everything should work better than before. In practice, it turns out that the situation is far from rosy.